One bug, every repo it lives in

Most SaaS regressions cross two or three repos before the customer even notices. Watari maps each ticket across your repo graph, drafts a PR per repo, and holds the customer RCA until every contributing fix is live.

A single bug rarely sits in a single repo

Most SaaS teams ship across several first-party repos: frontend, API, mobile, infra, internal tools. A regression that surfaces in the dashboard often demands a change in two or three of them. Ticketing tools paper over the seams; engineers re-discover the cross-repo footprint by hand, and the customer reply slips by days.

One case, start to finish

Tomas Reyes at Harbor and Pine Outfitters writes to Parcelkind’s support team in Zendesk. A Go codebase on GitHub. An illustrative case, with fictional companies.

Zendesk ticket #9152
  1. 1. Zendesk ticket #9152

    Orders never reached our warehouse

    “Those orders never came through, and your dashboard says they were delivered.”

    Tomas Reyes, Harbor and Pine Outfitters

  2. 2. Bug report

    Orders marked delivered when the receiver returns an error

    Critical

    Expected: Order retried until it arrives. Actual: Marked delivered, never retried.

  3. 3. Found in your code

    internal/webhooks/deliver.go

    deliver()

    A server error from the receiver counts as delivered, so the order is never retried.

  4. 4. Draft fix, PR #2207

    Retry order webhooks when the receiver returns a server error

    • Build passed
    • Unit tests passed
    • Race detector passed

    Review on GitHub

  5. 5. Customer update

    Hi Tomas, orders now keep retrying until your warehouse gets them.

    Sent when the fix is live. Posted to ticket #9152.

From Tomas Reyes's ticket to the draft fix and the update that tells them it is fixed.

One focused PR per repo it touches.

A regression in your dashboard often touches the API and the mobile client too. Watari opens a focused PR in each repository the bug touches, and only those. A per-org cap keeps one ambiguous ticket from spawning PRs across every repo you own.

Every connected repo searched
Watari looks across every connected repo, not just the one the ticket hints at.
Only the repos it touches
Watari opens a focused PR in each repository the bug touches, and only those.
Cap-aware
Per-org fan-out cap prevents one ambiguous ticket from spawning PRs across every repo you own.
Draft fix ready for review

CI passing

2 files changed · Strong match

apps/web #1289

Draft fix ready for review

CI passing

3 files changed · Strong match

services/api #882

Draft fix ready for review

CI passing

1 file changed · Strong match

apps/mobile #412

The draft fix: a pull request with the change and the tests that cover it, ready for review.

Right owners per repo.

Frontend owners on the frontend PR, infra owners on the infra PR, not a triager juggling three queues. Each draft PR resolves reviewers from its own repo’s CODEOWNERS. No CODEOWNERS? Watari suggests owners from who actually changes each file, and opens a PR to adopt them.

CODEOWNERS-per-repo
Each PR resolves reviewers from its own repo, not the originating one.
Suggested owners
No CODEOWNERS? Watari suggests owners from who actually changes each file.
One-click adoption
Accept the inferred file and Watari opens a PR adding it to that repo.
Who owns this code

acme/checkout-monorepo has no CODEOWNERS file. Each folder gets the person who made most of its changes in the last year.

  • apps/web/Suggested: @frontend-teamMost changes here in the last year
  • apps/api/Suggested: @api-teamMost changes here in the last year
Reviewers for the draft pull request, picked from the CODEOWNERS file you already keep.

Customer waits for the last fix to land.

The customer hears back when production has the whole fix, not the first piece of it. The RCA is gated on the slowest PR in the set: it is held until the production deploy contains every contributing fix. An audit-logged override is available for the rare exception.

All-or-nothing
The customer-facing RCA fires only when every contributing PR is deployed.
Deploy-gated
Held until the production deploy contains the fix. Every linked ticket gets it exactly once.
Audit-logged override
Engineers can force-publish; the override is recorded with actor + reason.

Deploy confirmed · production

The fix is live as of 10:01 UTC. Customer update posted to the support ticket.

10:01 UTC
Customer update
published

Checkout button hang on Safari 18: fix shipped

Hi Maya, the checkout button on Safari 18 was failing because of a null intent guard that misfired when cart totals crossed $200. We have shipped a fix to production at 10:01 UTC and your charge for #4928 is now reattempting automatically. No further action is needed on your end.

The update for the customer, held until production confirms the fix is live.
A fan-out without a gate is just more noise. Focused PRs in only the repos a bug touches, and an all-or-nothing RCA, are the two halves of the same promise.

1 bug = 1 charge

No matter how many repos it spans

Billing model

14d

Free trial of Growth. 3 repositories, 10 Mapped Issues. No card.

Trial policy

7d

Mismapped credit window

Billing model

Frequently asked questions

How many repos can Watari coordinate?

There is no hard ceiling, but a per-organization fan-out cap prevents one ambiguous ticket from spawning PRs across every repo you own. Connect as many as your team ships against, and Watari decides which ones a given bug actually touches.

What if one PR fails CI and the others pass?

The customer-facing RCA stays parked. Watari tracks every contributing PR; engineers see the failing repo flagged in the dashboard with the CI signal attached. Once the failing PR is fixed, merged, and shipped, the RCA publishes automatically: at deploy time if your platform reports deployments to GitHub, or at merge time otherwise (with a periodic check and a manual confirm as backup).

Does the customer get one RCA or several?

One. The customer-facing RCA describes a single bug and its resolution, not the engineering choreography. Internally you see every PR and every repo touched; externally the customer sees one update that fires only after the whole fix is live in production.

How do you pick which repos to fan out to?

Watari looks across every connected repo and opens a focused PR in each repository the bug touches, and only those. A per-org cap bounds the number of PRs so a vague ticket cannot flood your queue.

What is the billing impact of a multi-repo bug?

One Mapped Issue equals one charge regardless of repo count. A bug that fans into five repos is still one billable event under the dual ≥ 0.7 confidence gate. PR drafts, RCA, and tracker sync remain bundled. You are never metered on engineering choreography.

When a support ticket reports a bug, your engineers get a drafted fix.

Connect your help desk or your issue tracker, then GitHub or Azure DevOps. Watari maps each bug to the exact file and function in your code and drafts the fix as a pull request your CI checks.

14 days free. No card. Cancel any time.